LOS ANGELES - iSportsWire -- The importance of retaining a specialist when you have a life insurance claim investigation.

A California man died in a car crash when his Tesla slammed into a parked fire truck. An investigation showed the Tesla was operating under the full Self-Driving mode when the crash happened. Blood testing results showed the driver had a blood alcohol level of 0.09 (just over the legal limit in California).

The man had life insurance and the family filed a claim for the benefits. To their surprise the life insurance claim was denied because of an exclusion in the policy. The exclusion stated that if the insured dies of injuries that happen while drunk driving the policy will not payout.

More on iSports Wire

• Speranza Dental Implant Centers Opens Their First Location
• WWSG Announces Exclusive Speaking Partnership with Former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott
• Aidaptive and BizCor Expand Inhabit Partnership with Native Enterprise-Grade Search for Streamline Customers
• Pikmykid Partners with Vivi to Enhance School Emergency Communication and Safety
• AI Meets Cybersecurity: IQSTEL and Cycurion Take Aim at $500 Billion Market Opportunity

The family hired the Center for Life Insurance Disputes to fight the denied life insurance claim.

The Center discovered that Tesla's full Self-Driving function had a significant history of malfunctioning leading to numerous auto accidents – some deadly. The Center also uncovered that two blood test were done post-mortem but because of traffic fatality laws in California only one test result was used by the authorities. However, state regulations for traffic accidents only apply to authorities and don't allow an insurer to obfuscate their fair handling obligations.

The Center took their fight directly to the life insurer and won the appeal.

First, they showed that based on promises by Tesla about the full Self-Driving mode and the large number of accidents that happen while the Self-Driving mode is engaged the insured's alcohol level was immaterial.

More on iSports Wire

• N A S D A Q Compliance Achieved Following Active Trading and Financing, UAE Acquisition & Major Brand Events: Lottery.com Inc., (N A S D A Q: LTRY)
• New Frontier Aerospace Successfully Tests Its Revolutionary Mjölnir Rocket Engine
• Profiting from Elder Harm: The Push to End Psychiatric Drugging in Nursing Homes
• LET Mining launches zero-cost cloud mining, daily rewards + referral double benefits
• Veteran-Owned Small Business Trapped in Amazon Seller Catch-22 Over Fraudulent FBA Partner

Next, with the assistance of a seasoned toxicologist, they argued that the blood alcohol testing used for the Cause of Death did not sufficiently prove the man was intoxicated at the time of the accident. Rather, the second blood test result showed a blood alcohol level of only 0.07 (below the legal limit) and the insurer was obligated to weigh both results equally.

Without any refusal from the insurer to accept the findings and that the insured was not drunk driving at the time of the accident. The claim was quickly paid and interest was piled on.

Another win by The Center for Life Insurance Disputes.